
The Zhongli Incident
On November 19, 1977, Taiwan held local elections for five categories of public office. The race for Taoyuan county magistrate was unusually tense. Hsu Hsin-liang, a provincial assemblyman from the Kuomintang, had run without the party's nomination and been expelled for it; his opponent was the party's endorsed candidate, Ou Hsien-yu. It was a direct confrontation between a dangwai challenger and the ruling party — and everyone understood that what happened at the counting table often mattered more than what happened at the ballot box.
That morning, a disturbance broke out at polling station 213 at Zhongli Elementary School. A dentist named Chiu Yi-pin accused the supervising officer, school principal Fanchiang Hsin-lin, of spoiling a ballot with an ink-stained thumb while assisting an elderly illiterate couple, thereby invalidating it. Police escorted Fanchiang to the Zhongli precinct station, but the crowd read this as protection rather than investigation. Hundreds became thousands, and eventually more than ten thousand people surrounded the station.
After dark the situation broke down. Police vehicles were overturned and burned, the station itself was set alight, and police opened fire, killing a National Central University student, Chiang Wen-kuo, and a teenager, Chang Chih-ping. What was genuinely extraordinary, however, was what did not happen next. The army was not deployed. There were no mass arrests, no midnight raids of the kind martial law had accustomed people to expect. With an election in progress and international attention on the island, the authorities chose restraint. When the count was done, Hsu Hsin-liang had won the magistracy by roughly 220,000 votes to 130,000.
The weight of that day in postwar Taiwanese history lies not in the casualty figures but in a psychological threshold. S…
The weight of that day in postwar Taiwanese history lies not in the casualty figures but in a psychological threshold. Since the February 28 Incident and the White Terror, Taiwanese society had internalized an iron rule: to take to the street was to die. At Zhongli, tens of thousands of people tested that rule in person and found that, under at least some conditions, it did not hold. Once fear has been empirically checked, it never returns to its former height.
In the same election, dangwai candidates coordinated across county lines for the first time in an organized way, winning four magistracies and twenty-one provincial assembly seats and demonstrating an island-wide capacity for mobilization. Over the next two years that energy advanced along two tracks: the organizational structure built around Formosa Magazine, and the street. On December 10, 1979, the two converged in Kaohsiung. Many historians therefore read Zhongli as the rehearsal for the Kaohsiung Incident — not merely the step before it in time, but the first step in the same logic of action.
Hsu Hsin-liang himself did not walk the whole road. In 1979 he was suspended from office for supporting the Bridgehead demonstration on behalf of Yu Teng-fa and his son, and he spent more than a decade in exile. But the afternoon that began with a single spoiled ballot ultimately changed how an entire island understood the requirement that votes be counted in the open. The Taiwanese habit of standing outside a counting station watching each ballot held up to the light and to the cameras is not self-evident common sense. It was bought in the winter of 1977, in Zhongli, with two lives.
At first we only went to look. Word was that someone had been caught spoiling a ballot at polling station 213 — the kind of thing we had heard about for decades and never seen proved, and this time there was a witness and there was evidence. The police took the principal away, and we assumed he was being taken in. When nothing happened for hours, we understood he was being protected. More and more people came. The strange part is that past a certain size of crowd, the fear you are taught from childhood simply thins out. Walking alone you lower your eyes when you see a policeman; that afternoon tens of thousands of us stood on the same street and nobody lowered their eyes. Beside me were laborers, students, a woman with a child on her hip. Nobody was shouting about any ideology. It was one sentence: count the votes properly. After dark it went out of control. Vehicles burned, glass broke, then there were gunshots and someone went down. That was not the ending any of us had imagined when we set out. But the sun came up the next day, no troops entered the town, and there was no knock at the door in the night. That fact weighed more with us than the election result did. It turned out we were not the only ones who were afraid, and it turned out that going into the street did not necessarily mean dying. Once that thought exists, it never goes away.
Isle of Time